Ernst haeckel came up with what is called 'embryonic recapitulation' to support Darwin's evolution hypothesis.
He made a chart showing embyo's of various animals in three stages of development.It became very famous and he literally became a great scientist.He came up with 'Ontogeny repeats phylogeny'.
This is his chart which shows 8 different embryos in 3 similair stages of development.The earlier stages show more similarity than differences and that is the evidence for the embryological homology.This famous (fraudulent,cooked up) chart can be seen in all biology textbooks even today and Children are taught 'Ontogeny repeats phylogeny' with this chart as evidence.
This picture shows haeckel's manufactures drawings in the first row and original photographs in the second row.Embryoogical homology disappears in the original photographs of the embryo's .The second row contains original photographs,which disprove heckel's theory .Embrologic homology does not exist as haeckel claimed and is a hoax perpetrated by the evolutionists.
Haeckel's fraudulent diagrams are used even today to support evolution theory ,when in fact it is actually manufactured.
These photographs were taken by Michael richardson,a lecturer and embryologist at St George’s Hospital Medical School, London,who exposed this lie in his research paper ,"There is no highly conserved embryonic stage in the vertebrates: implications for current theories of evolution and development’, Anatomy and Embryology, 196(2): 91-106, 1997, copyright Springer-Verlag GmbH & Co., Tiergartenstrasse, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
youtube channel
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(12)
-
▼
September
(12)
- Logical fallacies 2
- What's common between RSS/BJP and Md.Ali Jinnah?
- Misconception clarified - Hinduism and Christianity
- Pseudotolerance = Intolerance
- Why does a Good God allow evil ?
- Haeckel fake embyo drawings
- Jesus and Gandhi - not the same
- Critic of Swami Vivekanandha's view of humanity
- Logical fallacies 1
- Moral objections to Islam
- Dawkins should learn the scientific definition of ...
- Is the atheistic understanding of religion right?
-
▼
September
(12)
No comments:
Post a Comment